Why is biblical poetry more difficult to interpret than other genres?
I think it has to do partly with how peoples brains work. A creative mind might be able to interpret poetry with easy while a more analytical mind might struggle, wanting to make it literal or black and white. I think we also see this play out in different translations or versions of the bible where we see different words that might have the same meaning but are more easily understood by a certain personality.
The other part is the meter of poetry. It can be very different from how we are used to reading causing people to stubble more, have to re-read the same thing multiple times to understand what is being said and ultimately getting frustrated, or is that just me!
In what ways have you seen apocalyptic literature (Daniel and Revelation) interpreted poorly? How do the tips for interpreting Apocalyptic literature avoid abusing or misusing these texts?
The biggest way I've seen apocalyptic literature interpreted poorly is when it's interpreted literally. I can think of so many times that people have quoted Revelation in a literal sense or used the mark of the beast as a scare tactic.
I did really like the point about making sure you have a good study guide or reading material to help understand what apocalyptic literature is saying because I think that is crucial to gaining the best understanding of what you're reading. I also didn't think about the history aspect. It was a good reminder to learn the history even when reading a book like Revelation that is about the future.